{"id":5161,"date":"2024-09-27T17:22:11","date_gmt":"2024-09-27T17:22:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/2024\/09\/27\/la-ley-que-busca-fortalecer-el-banco-nacional-de-perfiles-geneticos-en-colombia-paso-su-primer-debate-en-la-comision-primera-del-senado\/"},"modified":"2026-02-18T00:35:58","modified_gmt":"2026-02-18T00:35:58","slug":"la-ley-que-busca-fortalecer-el-banco-nacional-de-perfiles-geneticos-en-colombia-paso-su-primer-debate-en-la-comision-primera-del-senado","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/2024\/09\/27\/la-ley-que-busca-fortalecer-el-banco-nacional-de-perfiles-geneticos-en-colombia-paso-su-primer-debate-en-la-comision-primera-del-senado\/","title":{"rendered":"The law that seeks to strengthen the National Bank of Genetic Profiles in Colombia passed its first debate in the First Commission of the Senate."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The legislative initiative was presented as a collective multi-party report led by independent Senator Humberto de la Calle Lombana and supported with his signature by Senators Ariel \u00c1vila Mart\u00ednez (Green Party), Paloma Valencia Laserna (Democratic Center), Germ\u00e1n Blanco \u00c1lvarez (Conservative Party), Alejandro Vega P\u00e9rez (Liberal Party), David Luna S\u00e1nchez (Liberal Party), Clara Eugenia L\u00f3pez Obreg\u00f3n (Historical Pact), Guido Echeverri Piedrahita (Green Party) and Andrea Padilla Villarilla Villarreal (Historic Pact), Alejandro Vega P\u00e9rez (Liberal Party), David Luna S\u00e1nchez (Liberal Party), Clara Eugenia L\u00f3pez Obreg\u00f3n (Historic Pact), Guido Echeverri Piedrahita (Green Party) and Andrea Padilla Villaraga (Green Party), in addition to deputies Daniel Carvalho Mej\u00eda (Green Party) and Catherine Juvinao Clavijo (Green Party).<\/p>\n\n

The proposed regulatory framework serves a legitimate and well-established governmental interest: to facilitate the clarification of the facts that are the object of a judicial investigation in criminal matters, with the aim of proceeding to the individualization of the persons responsible, significantly improving both the criminal justice system and criminal investigation practices. The above, with several objectives, especially, to relate through the use of genetic technology, individuals with one or more facts of criminal relevance in order to protect the rights of victims, attribute responsibility, enhance decisions of exoneration or acquittal, reduce impunity and reduce recidivism. <\/p>\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n

A plenary debate is expected in the next few weeks in order to reach the bill’s effective sanction and start its implementation, in alliance with the institutions in charge of criminal prosecution, which are demanding for Colombia the modernization of its justice system and legal tools to increase its capacity to clarify and search for the truth.<\/p>\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With an absolute majority vote, the First Constitutional Commission of the Senate approved in first debate, last Thursday, September 25, Bill No. 138 of 2004 “whereby the National Bank of Genetic Profiles is strengthened for judicial investigation purposes in criminal matters and other provisions are enacted”. The bill was filed in the General Secretariat of the Senate of the Republic of Colombia since August 20 of this year. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4397,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5161\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4397"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justiciaforense.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}